Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today's Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):
Brian's Blog
Pre-2008 CDS:
- Favored for speculation, not just risk hedging.
- Little transparency, weak regulation.
- Amplified systemic risk, seen in Lehman Brothers' crisis.
- Exposed significant counterparty risk.
Current SRTs:
- Lean towards risk management, avoiding speculation.
- More stringent regulation post-2008.
- Clearer structure, targeted at reducing banks' credit risk.
- Transfers risk to diverse, risk-ready investors.
In essence, changes in usage (speculation to risk management), regulation (loose to tight), transparency, and risk management approach mark the shift from pre-2008 CDS to current SRTs.
💡 Let’s stop just collecting data. Let’s start making it work for us. Let’s transform banking, together. 💡
🔔 Follow Brian on Linkedin: Brian Pillmore
Related Links:
Similar Articles

Brian's Banking Blog
A Guide to Commercial Real Estate Lending

Brian's Banking Blog
Top Crisis Communication Strategies for Bank Leadership

Brian's Banking Blog
A Guide to Allowance for Credit Losses for Bank Executives

Brian's Banking Blog
A New Playbook for the Modern Bank Audit

Brian's Banking Blog
What Is Strategic Risk Management for Banks?

Brian's Banking Blog
8 Historic Banks That Merged: Lessons for Today's Executive

Brian's Banking Blog
What Is Scenario Planning for Modern Banks?

Brian's Banking Blog
A Guide to Risk and Control Self Assessment

Brian's Banking Blog
Analysis of the Largest Credit Unions: Strategic Insights for 2025

Brian's Banking Blog