U.S. Regulators Issue New Guidance for Third-Party Risk Management

U.S. Regulators Issue New Guidance for Third-Party Risk Management

This week, U.S regulators published new third-party risk management guidance for banks. The guidance was an interagency product from the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) of Governors, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

The new guidance is designed to update the agencies’ 2021 Interagency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management. It is intended to provide best practice standards to help banks manage third-party risks. According to a statement from the FDIC, the updated guidance replaces the three agencies’ prior guidance.

No new third-party risk management requirements

The regulators said that the purpose of the document is to provide greater clarity and consistency for the industry. As a result, they assert that there are no new requirements for affected financial institutions. Instead, the guide offers updated standards and practices banks can rely on as they manage risks associated with third-party relationships.

According to the guide, the agencies are emphasizing a principles-based approach to risk-management. That approach is designed to encourage banks to assess risk based on each relationship’s unique situation. Referencing this flexibility, the guide notes:

“[A]s part of sound risk management, it is the responsibility of each banking organization to analyze the risks associated with each third-party relationship and to calibrate its risk management processes, commensurate with the banking organization’s size, complexity, and risk profile and with the nature of its third-party relationships.”

Notably, regulators encouraged banks to do their due diligence for each third-party relationship. That includes assessing those firms’ strategies, ownership structure, and other relevant concerns. In addition, banks are advised to perform monitoring of those third parties on a consistent and ongoing basis.

Interestingly, one Fed member and one FDIC board member opposed the new advice. The two dissenters cited alleged ambiguity and an increased burden for smaller banks. However, one trade group, the Financial Technology Association welcomed the third-party risk management guide.

Learn more on this topic

Related Insights

Climate Activists Agitate to End Non-Renewable Energy Funding

Climate Activists Agitate to End Non-Renewable Energy Funding

On Sunday, September 17, a reported 75,000 climate activists protested In New York City in the “March to End Fossil Fuels.” One day later, hundreds of agitators moved to blockade New York’s Federal Reserve Bank in an act that has been referred to as civil...

BIS Warns Investors that High Interest Rates May Persist

BIS Warns Investors that High Interest Rates May Persist

The Bank for International Settlements has just warned global investors about the possibility of continued high interest rates. The BIS cautioned that continued high inflation would likely force the Federal Reserve and other central banks to keep rates at the current...