Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today’s Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):

Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today’s Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):

Pre-2008 CDS:
– Favored for speculation, not just risk hedging.
– Little transparency, weak regulation.
– Amplified systemic risk, seen in Lehman Brothers’ crisis.
– Exposed significant counterparty risk.

Current SRTs:
– Lean towards risk management, avoiding speculation.
– More stringent regulation post-2008.
– Clearer structure, targeted at reducing banks’ credit risk.
– Transfers risk to diverse, risk-ready investors.

In essence, changes in usage (speculation to risk management), regulation (loose to tight), transparency, and risk management approach mark the shift from pre-2008 CDS to current SRTs.

💡 Let’s stop just collecting data. Let’s start making it work for us. Let’s transform banking, together. 💡

🔔 Follow Brian on Linkedin: Brian Pillmore

Learn more on this topic

Related Insights

Why does bank data matter more than you think?

Why does bank data matter more than you think?

Banks are like a goldmine of data. Every transaction, every customer interaction, and every financial report is another nugget of information waiting to be utilized. Why does this matter? 1. Data fuels decision making: In the world of banking, data-driven insights can...

How can data science transform the banking industry?

How can data science transform the banking industry?

In the era of Big Data, banks sit on a goldmine of customer-related information. Harvesting this data intelligently can result in enhanced services and better risk management. Here's how: 1. Personalized customer experience -With the help of machine learning and AI,...