Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today’s Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):

Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today’s Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):

Pre-2008 CDS:
– Favored for speculation, not just risk hedging.
– Little transparency, weak regulation.
– Amplified systemic risk, seen in Lehman Brothers’ crisis.
– Exposed significant counterparty risk.

Current SRTs:
– Lean towards risk management, avoiding speculation.
– More stringent regulation post-2008.
– Clearer structure, targeted at reducing banks’ credit risk.
– Transfers risk to diverse, risk-ready investors.

In essence, changes in usage (speculation to risk management), regulation (loose to tight), transparency, and risk management approach mark the shift from pre-2008 CDS to current SRTs.

💡 Let’s stop just collecting data. Let’s start making it work for us. Let’s transform banking, together. 💡

🔔 Follow Brian on Linkedin: Brian Pillmore

Learn more on this topic

Related Insights

What do data science and the banking industry have in common?

What do data science and the banking industry have in common?

Data is the glue that's binding the world today. Especially in industries like banking where everything revolves around figures. Data science and actionable business intelligence are no longer optional – they’re a necessity in the age of big data. Here's why: 1....