The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has made a significant decision. They’ve chosen not to revise how companies, particularly financial institutions, handle their held-to-maturity (HTM) securities. This decision has its roots in the recurring debates following significant financial crises, most recently Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse.
Under the current rules, organizations can report varying amounts for identical debt securities. The rule hinges on their intended handling of these securities. When designated as HTM, banks can exclude unrealized losses from equity, providing they don’t sell. This process necessitates carrying HTM instruments at amortized cost.
However, the situation isn’t always so clear-cut. There are instances when banks change their stance on these securities. If they sell any HTM securities, they must reclassify all HTM securities as available for sale. This can lead to substantial losses on the securities that remain unsold.
FASB, in its recent announcement, stated that it would not consider eliminating HTM classification for debt securities. Nor would it require banks to disclose the fair value of their HTM securities on their balance sheets, a practice many already follow.
This decision might spark questions and concerns. However, board members believe investors already possess necessary information about these securities in footnotes. The consensus is clear – there’s no problem to solve.
There’s no denying the impact of this decision on the financial sector. As CFOs, it is crucial to stay updated and make informed decisions based on new developments. Be proactive in understanding these shifts and how they affect your organization’s financial health.
💡 Let’s stop just collecting data. Let’s start making it work for us. Let’s transform banking, together. 💡
🔔 Follow Brian on Linkedin: Brian Pillmore
