Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today’s Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):

Pre-2008 Credit Default Swaps (CDS) vs Today’s Synthetic Risk Transfers (SRTs):

Pre-2008 CDS:
– Favored for speculation, not just risk hedging.
– Little transparency, weak regulation.
– Amplified systemic risk, seen in Lehman Brothers’ crisis.
– Exposed significant counterparty risk.

Current SRTs:
– Lean towards risk management, avoiding speculation.
– More stringent regulation post-2008.
– Clearer structure, targeted at reducing banks’ credit risk.
– Transfers risk to diverse, risk-ready investors.

In essence, changes in usage (speculation to risk management), regulation (loose to tight), transparency, and risk management approach mark the shift from pre-2008 CDS to current SRTs.

💡 Let’s stop just collecting data. Let’s start making it work for us. Let’s transform banking, together. 💡

🔔 Follow Brian on Linkedin: Brian Pillmore

Learn more on this topic

Related Insights

Rethinking Banking: Is Data the New Oil?

Rethinking Banking: Is Data the New Oil?

In an era where data is the new oil, banks are missing out on opportunities if they're not utilizing it effectively. The banking industry is reaching a crucial point in its evolution - data science and actionable business intelligence are driving this change. Data has...